http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/30/opinion/30blum.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Ghosts in the Machine
By DEBORAH BLUM
Madison, Wis.

THE human brain is, in surprising part, an appliance powered by
electricity. It constantly generates about 12 watts of energy, enough to
keep a flashlight glowing. It works by sending out electrical impulses
? bursts of power running along the cellular wires of the nervous
system ? to stimulate muscles into motion or thought into being. We're
mostly aware of this when the machine falters, when it short-circuits
into epilepsy or frays into the tremors of Parkinson's disease.

So when scientists wrote in a recent issue of the journal Nature that
they could induce phantom effects ? the sensation of being haunted by
a shadowy figure ? by stimulating the brain with electricity, it made
perfect neurological sense. One could even argue that the existence of
such sensations explains away the so-called supernatural. In fact, as
The Times reported, the researchers promptly concluded that ghosts are
mere "bodily delusions," electrical misfirings and nothing more.

The report does look like a kind of proof ? albeit very small proof,
as this was a study of two people ? if one happens already to believe
that ghosts are no more than biological quirks. But what's fascinating
is that it can also look like proof that ghosts are real entities, to
those inclined to believe as much. And so the findings also present a
case study in two very different perspectives.

The scientific study of the supernatural began in the late 19th century,
in synchrony with the age of energy. It's hardly coincidental that as
traditional science began to reveal the hidden potential of nature's
powers ? magnetic fields, radiation, radio waves, electrical currents
? paranormal researchers began to suggest that the occult operated in
similar ways.

A fair number of these occult explorers were scientists who studied
nature's highly charged circuits. Marie Curie, who did some of the first
research into radioactive elements like uranium, attended séances to
assess the powers of mediums. So did the British physicist J. J.
Thomson, who demonstrated the existence of the electron in 1897. And so
did Thomson's colleague, John Strutt, Lord Rayleigh, who won the 1904
Nobel Prize in Physics for his work with atmospheric gases.

Rayleigh would later become president of the British Society for
Psychical Research. And he would be joined in that organization by other
physicists, including the wireless radio pioneer Sir Oliver Lodge, who
proposed that both telepathy and ghostly appearances were achieved
through energy transmissions connecting living minds to one another and
perhaps even to the dead.

Lodge argued that the human brain could function as a kind of receiver,
picking up signals at a subconscious level. These were powered by some
undiscovered energy, traveling perhaps in waves, perhaps in currents.
Such transmissions lay behind telepathic experiences, including shared
thoughts. Along the same lines, he thought it possible that a spirit's
appearance was really just its specific energy signal stimulating a
response from the receiver's brain.

The theories developed by Lodge and his colleagues dovetail rather
neatly with the electricity-produced hauntings that Olaf Blanke, a Swiss
neuroscientist, reports in Nature. For example, he used an implanted
electrode to send a current into a region of the brain called the
angular gyrus. The test was focused on language processing. But as a
side effect, one of the test subjects nervously reported sensing another
person in bed with her, silent and shadowy. Her creepy companion came
and went with the ebb and flow of current.

It would be compelling ? and more convincing ? if the same result
could be exhibited in a few more subjects. But Dr. Blanke believes that
even this one subject's experience serves as an example of how we may
mistake errant signals in the brain for something more. Humans tend, he
points out, to seek explanation, to impose meaning on events that may
have none. The pure rationalists among us suggest that our need to add
meaning to a basic, biological existence easily accounts for the way we
organize religions and find evidence of otherworldly powers in the stuff
of everyday life.
The nonpurists suggest a different conclusion: willful scientific
blindness. And there's no reason Dr. Blanke's study can't support their
theories of the paranormal. Perhaps his experimental electric current
simply mimics the work of an equally powerful spirit. Much of the
psychical research done today applies similar principles: brain-imaging
machines highlight parts of the brain that respond to psychic phenomena,
while other devices are used to search for infrared radiation or
increased electrical activity in haunted houses.

The American psychologist and philosopher William James, also a leader
in the Victorian paranormal research movement, remarked even then on the
culture clash: "How often has 'Science' killed off all spook philosophy,
and laid ghosts and raps and 'telepathy' underground as so much popular
delusion?" he wrote in 1909. And how often, James wondered rhetorically,
had such efforts stopped people from seeing ghosts and believing in
supernatural powers?

Because in the end, of course, the conclusion has nothing to do with
science at all and everything to do with how one sees the world.
I suspect that we'll dwell forever in the haunted landscape of our
beliefs. To many people it's a world more interesting ? bigger,
stranger, more mysterious ? than the one offered by science. Why
choose instead to be creatures of chemical impulse and electrical
twitch? We would rather gamble on even a tiny, electrical spark of a
chance that we are something more.

Deborah Blum, a professor of journalism at the University of Wisconsin
who won a Pulitzer Prize in 1992, is the author of "Ghost Hunters:
William James and the Scientific Search for Life After Death."